[Bug fortran/26025] Optionally use BLAS for matmul

2006-10-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-22 07:43 --- Fixed on mainline. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/26025] Optionally use BLAS for matmul

2006-10-22 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-22 07:42 --- Subject: Bug 26025 Author: fxcoudert Date: Sun Oct 22 07:41:48 2006 New Revision: 117948 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=117948 Log: PR fortran/26025 * lang.opt: Add -fexte

[Bug fortran/26025] Optionally use BLAS for matmul

2006-10-07 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-07 10:02 --- New patch. New link. One-oh-one. -- steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/26025] Optionally use BLAS for matmul

2006-09-25 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-25 08:58 --- Patch proposed here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-09/msg00325.html Janne, as I know you were interested in that feature, could you look at my patch if you have some time? -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot

[Bug fortran/26025] Optionally use BLAS for matmul

2006-02-21 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-21 20:55 --- Here's a message on the mailing list that provides some benchmarks as well as one possible interface for how one could use it: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2005-11/msg00474.html Actually, I'm feeling a bit tired of ban

[Bug fortran/26025] Optionally use BLAS for matmul

2006-01-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-30 12:36 --- Confirmed -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONF