[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2021-12-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26766 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a5e71f2348adcc49939804889d9f1a64d97005a commit r12-6006-g4a5e71f2348adcc49939804889d9f1a64d97005a Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Nov 13 06

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-04-06 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-07 04:00 --- Subject: Bug number PR26766 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg00249.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-04-12 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 06:25 --- Subject: Bug 26766 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Apr 13 06:24:58 2006 New Revision: 112914 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112914 Log: 2006-04-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-04-12 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-13 06:30 --- Subject: Bug 26766 Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Apr 13 06:30:04 2006 New Revision: 112915 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=112915 Log: 2006-04-12 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-04-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 04:31 --- Subject: Bug 26766 Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Apr 17 04:31:18 2006 New Revision: 113002 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113002 Log: 2006-04-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-04-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 04:34 --- Subject: Bug 26766 Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Apr 17 04:33:59 2006 New Revision: 113003 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113003 Log: 2006-04-16 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-04-16 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-17 04:38 --- Fixed on 4.1 and trunk -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-03-20 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-20 17:20 --- Confirmed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-03-20 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-21 06:05 --- Looking at -fdump-tree-original, should the internal unit descriptors in foo and in main have the same value? foo (__result, .__result, i) { if (*i < 0) { _gfortran_copy_string (4, __result, 4, "123

[Bug fortran/26766] [F2003] Recursive I/O still (again) broken

2006-03-23 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-24 02:06 --- I think I have a fix for this. The internal_unit is a single static variable declared in unit.c. So when we have recursive calls to internal IO we are stepping on our own feet. The dtp structure also contains a