--- Comment #19 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-09 22:10
---
OK, closing as fixed, then.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #18 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-05-09 20:15 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran: Warn/abort when format in write
does not fit passed arguments
@resolution : FIXED
> This looks like you have an old version of the library around, and that it's
> used in
--- Comment #17 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 07:04
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I probably do something wrong, but with
> GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060504 (experimental)
> from http://quatramaran.ens.fr/~coudert/gfortran/gfortran-x86_64-linux.tar.gz
>
> I st
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 00:13
---
I can not reproduce this here. I don't have that platform. I am guessing this
is a platform specific problem or a build problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27304
--- Comment #15 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-05-04 19:09 ---
I probably do something wrong, but with
GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060504 (experimental)
from http://quatramaran.ens.fr/~coudert/gfortran/gfortran-x86_64-linux.tar.gz
I still don't get a run-
--- Comment #14 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-05-02 08:37 ---
> Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
Thanks for fixing :-)
Still it would be nice if it would be detected during compile time. In
my case it was burried in an
if(something that rarely happens) write(*,'(''
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 21:02
---
Fixed on 4.1 and 4.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 21:02
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 30 21:02:10 2006
New Revision: 113398
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113398
Log:
2006-04-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-30 20:59
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Apr 30 20:59:08 2006
New Revision: 113397
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113397
Log:
2006-04-30 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-29 00:02
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Apr 29 00:02:10 2006
New Revision: 113364
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113364
Log:
2006-04-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-28 23:55
---
Subject: Bug 27304
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 28 23:55:30 2006
New Revision: 113363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113363
Log:
2006-04-28 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #8 from burnus at net-b dot de 2006-04-27 08:09 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran: Warn/abort when format in write
does not fit passed arguments
(In reply to comment #7)
> Tobias, I hope this is what you were looking for. I don't really
think we need
> a compile time check. That
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-27 06:02
---
Tobias, I hope this is what you were looking for. I don't really think we need
a compile time check. That would be pretty involved to do and the error is
caught at runtime.
What do you think?
--
http://gcc
--- Comment #6 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-04-27 05:50 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27304
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-04/msg01023.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 22:53
---
The standard reference seems clear. I will see about giving a runtime error.
Someone else will have to do the compile time magic.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27304
--- Comment #4 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-04-26 06:22 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran: Warn/abort when format in write
does not fit passed arguments
> I wonder if this is a case of illegal code. Intel errors on "infinite
> format".
Well, current g95, ifort
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-26 04:10
---
I am not sure (emphasis on not sure) I agree with this. But I can explain what
it is doing. It is correctly printing out the letter 'n' then its looking for
the first data item and finds the integer in the list,
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-04-25 18:33 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-04-25 17:24 ---
Post scriptum:
I actually see two bugs here:
(a) for static format strings, the test should be done at the compile time
(possibly also for c = '(''n'')'; write(*,c) n )
-> see NAG compiler
(b) f
19 matches
Mail list logo
