--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-31 10:24 ---
Subject: Bug 27588
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jan 31 10:23:53 2007
New Revision: 121401
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121401
Log:
(This part was missing in the r118852 / Wed Nov 15 10:13:16
--- Comment #11 from chaoyingfu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-01 02:00
---
Subject: Bug 27588
Author: chaoyingfu
Date: Fri Dec 1 01:57:22 2006
New Revision: 119394
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=119394
Log:
Merged revisions 118791-118987 via svnmerge from
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 10:13 ---
Subject: Bug 27588
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 15 10:13:16 2006
New Revision: 118852
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=118852
Log:
fortran/
2006-11-15 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-15 10:16 ---
Fixed in 4.3 == trunk.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 20:46 ---
The latest patch is at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01030.html
Problems:
- variable name missing
- line number is off-by-one
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27588
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-10 22:41 ---
Mine.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|fxcoudert
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-11-11 01:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27588
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00694.html
--
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-05 08:07 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27588
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00234.html
--
--- Comment #3 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-10-02 15:15 ---
From Francois-Xavier Coudert 2006-06-08
I'm writing a patch to add substring bounds checking. I hope to post it in the
next few days.
What is the status? If you have something, I'd save my time
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier dot Coudert at ens dot fr 2006-10-02
15:32 ---
Subject: Re: -fbounds-check should catch substring out of range accesses
I'm writing a patch to add substring bounds checking. I hope to post it in the
next few days.
Great!
What is the status? If
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-08 09:01
---
I'm writing a patch to add substring bounds checking. I hope to post it in the
next few days.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-05 21:01 ---
Tobias,
You are right, we do not check character lengths in assignment, yet. It is
another PR but I just do not recall which, right now. You are correct, that
this should be included in bounds checking. The
--
tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
13 matches
Mail list logo
