--- Comment #17 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-30 16:10 ---
Yes, tonto-1.0-nullify-1.patch in PR 26106 is the one.
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 16:00 ---
Subject: Bug 27662
Author: hjl
Date: Tue May 30 16:00:42 2006
New Revision: 114240
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114240
Log:
gcc/fortran/
2006-05-30 H.J. Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR f
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-30 04:45 ---
HJ,
It seems to me that you can clear this one on 4.1 now and get rid of the PR.
I am working on tonto-2.2, when I have the odd moment. Did you post the
patches that you need to make the spec test work; ie. are the
--- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 05:03 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Are you using Tonto in SPEC CPU 2006? It is slightly different from Tonto 1.0
> on SF. The problem in Tonto in SPEC CPU 2006 is it uses something like
Ah, sorry HJ. You are right.
> But n
--- Comment #13 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-24 06:08 ---
Re. comment #12, my copy of the June 1997 Fortran 95 draft is very clear
assuming we agree that there is no default initialization for this pointer.
14.6.2.1 Pointer association status
A pointer may have a pointer a
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-05-23 17:15 ---
Are you using Tonto in SPEC CPU 2006? It is slightly different from Tonto 1.0
on SF. The problem in Tonto in SPEC CPU 2006 is it uses something like
integer, pointer :: d
...
if (associated(d)) call abort()
But nullify is
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-23 16:28 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> I applied the same patch to gcc 4.1 redhat. Now I can build and run SPEC CPU
> 2006 successfully with gcc for the first time. The only issue is I have to
> apply 2 patches to tonto in SPEC
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
