[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-07-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 10:12 --- Subject: Bug 27980 Author: tkoenig Date: Sun Jul 16 10:11:57 2006 New Revision: 115496 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=115496 Log: 2006-07-16 Thomas Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-07-16 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-16 10:12 --- Fixed on mainline and 4.1. Closing. -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-07-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-15 21:47 --- Created an attachment (id=11893) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11893action=view) Patch for 4.1 Adapted patch for 4.1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27980

[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:29 --- Was fixed on mainline by r114677 | tkoenig | 2006-06-15 12:30:09 +0200 (Thu, 15 Jun 2006) | 23 lines 2006-06-15 Thomas Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] * trans-array.h (gfc_trans_create_temp_array): Add bool

[Bug fortran/27980] [4.1 only] Wrong allocation for zero-sized function result

2006-06-19 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-19 22:45 --- The backport of that patch is not trivial, since the mainline patch depends on Erik E.'s allocatable function result patch, which was never included in 4.1. I don't think it's difficult to backport either, but