--- Comment #11 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 16:06 ---
Fixed (with an extended version of the patch attached above).
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #10 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 16:02 ---
Subject: Bug 29785
Author: domob
Date: Thu Aug 19 16:02:30 2010
New Revision: 163377
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163377
Log:
2010-08-19 Daniel Kraft
PR fortran/29785
PR
--- Comment #9 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-18 19:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=21514)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21514&action=view)
Partial patch.
This implements rank remapping and also bounds remapping as for PR 45016.
Tests seem to be succes
--- Comment #8 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 18:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Tobias (and all): Do you think we should check for "the size of data-target
> shall not be less than the size of data-pointer-object" at runtime when
> -fcheck=bounds is given?
>
Yes.
The
--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 17:38 ---
Tobias (and all): Do you think we should check for "the size of data-target
shall not be less than the size of data-pointer-object" at runtime when
-fcheck=bounds is given?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 10:14 ---
See also PR 45016, which is not about bounds remapping but about setting the
correct bounds in an array assignment. (Wrong-code F95 bug + missing F2003
feature).
Maybe all three (remapping, fix bounds, F2003 lower bo
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 09:06 ---
I'll work on this.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|u
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 09:03 ---
Fortran 2008 has the following, which I missed to quote:
"If bounds-remapping-list is specified, the pointer target shall be simply
contiguous (6.5.4) or of rank one. It shall not be a disassociated or undefined
poin
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-08-07 07:35 ---
still missing 4.5.0, this seems a particularly useful F03 feature ;-)
For an expert, should be 'easy' to add (ignoring the F2008 variant) ?
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-03 16:09 ---
In Fortran 2008 the rank-one constraint is gone:
"C720 If bounds-remapping-list is not specified, the ranks of
data-pointer-object and data-target shall be the same."
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-12 09:19 ---
Cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-04/msg00120.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29785
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfir
12 matches
Mail list logo