--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 10:59
---
Subject: Bug 29804
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Thu Jul 12 10:58:49 2007
New Revision: 126578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=126578
Log:
PR fortran/29804
*
--- Comment #10 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-12 11:16
---
I can't see this bug on i686-linux nor x86_64-linux, even with valgrind. I
committed the testcase into our testsuite, so that we can see if it ever
reappears.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-10 13:20 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Salvatore, could you please recheck this one? I can not observe any problems,
neither on dt_bnd.f90 nor on the reduced testcase.
Neither can I, it seems to have fixed itself.
Should we
Have you looked with valgrind or similar to see if there are errors occurring?
Please definitely put in the testsuite. There may be something we don't see yet
going on here.
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2007-07-10 13:43 ---
Subject: Re: segfault with -fbounds-check on allocatable
derived type components
Have you looked with valgrind or similar to see if there are errors occurring?
Please definitely put in the testsuite. There may
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-07 19:07 ---
Salvatore, could you please recheck this one? I can not observe any problems,
neither on dt_bnd.f90 nor on the reduced testcase.
$ gfortran-svn -g -fbounds-check dt_bnd.f90 ./a.out
[snipped output]
$ valgrind
--- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2006-11-11 21:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=12592)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12592action=view)
Test case
Very much reduced from a real application code, possibly not minimal yet.
--
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 22:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=12593)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12593action=view)
Reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29804
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 22:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=12594)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12594action=view)
Reduced test case
Ignore previous attachment that was the wrong file.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 22:52 ---
Salvatore,
When I got round to your off-list email, I foun that it was empty. I was about
to contact you.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29804
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 23:12 ---
Rather than segfaulting, with Cywin_NT the progam produces
Inconsistent BV for IL1! in runtime.
It runs fine withou -founds-check.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29804
12 matches
Mail list logo
