--- Comment #41 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-21 15:05 ---
Subject: Bug 29975
Author: pault
Date: Thu Dec 21 15:05:24 2006
New Revision: 120113
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=120113
Log:
2006-12-21 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #40 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-19 12:49 ---
I've now checked that gcc trunk (revision 120045) compiles CP2K (at -O3
-ftree-vectorize -ffast-math -march=opteron) and that the numerical results
seem acceptable. Great job... I hope the the original file is kept arou
--- Comment #39 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-13 15:25 ---
I had a look at one of the failing testcases from CP2K testsuite, and under
valgrind there were a number of errors that could be reproduced in the small
testcase of PR30200
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Comment #38 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 14:03 ---
Hi Paul,
(In reply to comment #36)
> > input_cp2k_motion.f90:3122: internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at
>
> A reduced version of this one would be very nice - if I would guess, it will
> be an assignment in
--- Comment #37 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-13 14:01 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
well, this was reduced, filed as PR30147, and fixed. Tobias reduced another one
and filed it as PR30190 (see dependencies).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29975
--- Comment #36 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-13 13:37 ---
Joost,
> input_cp2k_motion.f90
> input_cp2k_motion.f90: In function ‘create_neb_section’:
> input_cp2k_motion.f90:3122: internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at
> fold-const.c:2150
>
> in fact, this is on a file
--- Comment #35 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-11 16:08 ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> CP2k actually gives here an ICE with -O2 (PR 30147)
> at least when I use ./do_regtest (otherwise I didn't saw it). I did not yet
> look at why the calculation results are wrong.
>
yes, I'm
--- Comment #34 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 15:56 ---
CP2k actually gives here an ICE with -O2 (PR 30147)
at least when I use ./do_regtest (otherwise I didn't saw it). I did not yet
look at why the calculation results are wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--- Comment #33 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-11 11:54 ---
Running the CP2K regtests now results in:
number of FAILED tests 24
(these are just the runs that do not complete, I have not checked that the runs
that finish also generate the right numbers. This can be reproduced us
--- Comment #32 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-11 11:29 ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> > > gcc version 4.3.0 20061210 (experimental)
> > simple testcase for the segfault:
> I tried it with gfortran 4.3 and 4.2 (today's build) and an older 4.1 build
> and
> neither crashes. val
--- Comment #31 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-12-11 10:07 ---
> > gcc version 4.3.0 20061210 (experimental)
> simple testcase for the segfault:
I tried it with gfortran 4.3 and 4.2 (today's build) and an older 4.1 build and
neither crashes. valgrind also shows no error.
The or
--- Comment #30 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2006-12-11 09:51 ---
(In reply to comment #29)
simple testcase for the segfault:
SUBROUTINE S(unit_number)
character(len=100) :: status_string
integer :: unit_number,istat
status_string="KEEP"
CLOSE (UNIT=unit_number,IOSTAT=istat,STATUS=T
12 matches
Mail list logo
