[Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name

2007-01-23 Thread mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 16:26 --- fortran seems to bootstrap now. -- mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name

2007-01-22 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 22:14 --- Can you try after: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2007-01/msg00765.html ? and later used without extra if(name) in: No, that means it is used possiable as null. You need to check inside pure_function to see if

[Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name

2007-01-22 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-22 22:25 --- No, that means it is used possiable as null. You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the second argument does not get initialized. There is: if (e-symtree != NULL

[Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name

2007-01-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 06:26 --- (In reply to comment #2) No, that means it is used possiable as null. You need to check inside pure_function to see if there is a way that the second argument does not get initialized. There is: if

[Bug fortran/30549] compiler warning in resolve.c: possibly uninitialized use of name

2007-01-22 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-23 07:19 --- Subject: Bug 30549 Author: pault Date: Tue Jan 23 07:19:26 2007 New Revision: 121080 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=121080 Log: 2007-01-23 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR