[Bug fortran/30878] Rejects function f1; namelist /nml/ f1

2007-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-11 12:48 --- Fixed on trunk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug fortran/30878] Rejects function f1; namelist /nml/ f1

2007-05-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-11 12:43 --- Subject: Bug 30878 Author: pault Date: Fri May 11 11:42:56 2007 New Revision: 124615 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=124615 Log: 2007-05-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/30

[Bug fortran/30878] Rejects function f1; namelist /nml/ f1

2007-05-10 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-05-10 08:14 --- Subject: Bug number PR30878 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00623.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh

[Bug fortran/30878] Rejects function f1; namelist /nml/ f1

2007-05-08 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-08 13:51 --- I'll submit a fix tonight. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30878] Rejects function f1; namelist /nml/ f1

2007-03-23 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-23 21:41 --- There are only two restrictions on the namelist-group-objects, and this one is not in the list: C574 (R553) A namelist-group-object shall not be an assumed-size array. C575 (R552) A namelist-group-object shall no

[Bug fortran/30878] Rejects function f1; namelist /nml/ f1

2007-02-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-02-20 15:59 --- INTEGER FUNCTION F1() NAMELIST /NML/ F1 is rejected: NAMELIST /NML/ F1 1 Error: PROCEDURE attribute conflicts with NAMELIST attribute in 'f1' at (1) I didn't check yet whether this i