http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
2012-10-20 14:59:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Hi,
can someone fortran aware please double-check that the tests
* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_9.f90:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-10-20
15:43:13 UTC ---
can someone fortran aware please double-check that the tests
* gfortran.dg/bounds_check_9.f90: New test.
*
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 21:25
---
Subject: Bug 31119
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Sep 18 21:25:40 2007
New Revision: 128587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=128587
Log:
PR fortran/31119
* trans-array.c
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-18 21:34
---
Fixed.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-04 06:35 ---
patch ping ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31119
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-19 09:05
---
Created an attachment (id=13229)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13229action=view)
Patch that fixes the issue reported
The attached patch fixes the issue for the reported testcase. I checked
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-18 17:49
---
*** Bug 31148 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-03-10 08:47 ---
The problem is that the bounds of an optional argument are checked,
regardlessly whether it is present.
int8 ubound.0;
if (ivec != 0B)
{
ubound.0 = (ivec-dim[0].ubound - ivec-dim[0].lbound) + 1;
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
12 matches
Mail list logo
