--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-12 09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 31472
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Apr 12 09:46:30 2007
New Revision: 123735
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=123735
Log:
2007-04-12 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-12 09:58 ---
Fixed in 4.3. No regression and rejects only valid Fortran 2003 code - no
backporting to 4.2 - Fixed.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-11 09:44 ---
Fortran 95
--
4.4.1 Derived-type definition
TYPE [ [ , access-spec ] :: ] type-name
[ private-sequence-stmt ] ! no PUBLIC!
access spec PRIVATE statement only in specification part of a module.
5.1 Type
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-04-11 16:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 31472
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00558.html
--
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-05 14:13 ---
The patch is wrong since the PRIVATE/PUBLIC statement is also allowed for type:
module foo
type t
private
integer, public :: foo
end type t
end module foo
Actually, currently gfortran also invalidly rejects the
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-04 18:47 ---
Accepted. Thanks for the report.
We do check for this but only for the PRIVATE/PUBLIC attribute and not for the
PUBLIC/PRIVATE statement.
Patch:
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
