[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-09-06 Thread patchapp at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #10 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-09-06 11:55 --- Subject: Bug number PR31564 A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker. The mailing list url for the patch is http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-09/msg00319.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-09-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 13:38 --- Fixed on trunk. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-09-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-05 13:34 --- Subject: Bug 31564 Author: pault Date: Wed Sep 5 13:34:25 2007 New Revision: 128130 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128130 Log: 2007-09-05 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-09-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-04 18:16 --- To my surprise, I have a fix for this one. I'll post it to the list in the next 48 hours. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-08-17 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-18 06:04 --- This one is a real head-banger. The array element reference is being completely ignored in translation. I tried simplifying it by grabbing out the array component and attaching the array reference to it. The resulti

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-06-03 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-03 19:28 --- I never seem to get time to do anything about this bug, so I'll better unassign it from me. -- eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-05-28 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-28 18:51 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Created an attachment (id=13618) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13618&action=view) [edit] > > decl.c patch (not check-gfortran tested) >

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-05-28 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-28 15:41 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Created an attachment (id=13618) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13618&action=view) [edit] > decl.c patch (not check-gfortran tested) > > Erik, are you still working

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-05-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-27 23:40 --- Created an attachment (id=13618) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13618&action=view) decl.c patch (not check-gfortran tested) Erik, are you still working on this? One should also check that:

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-04-22 Thread eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-04-13 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keywo

[Bug fortran/31564] Error: Type/rank mismatch in argument

2007-04-13 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 19:05 --- The code is illegal, but in accordance with the error message. You need to set WHICH to 1 via either INTEGER :: which = 1 or which = 1 This however doesn't fix the problem. If you change the call to