[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2010-11-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-16 21:23:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Nov 16 21:23:19 2010 New Revision: 166825 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=166825 Log: / 2010-11-13

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2010-11-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2010-11-15 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-15 09:12:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) Last patch: Now: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00243.html

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2010-10-27 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-27 21:53:14 UTC --- Last patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00262.html

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2010-08-27 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 21:24 --- Subject: Bug 32049 Author: fxcoudert Date: Fri Aug 27 21:24:13 2010 New Revision: 163597 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=163597 Log: PR fortran/32049 * gfortran.h

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2010-06-08 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2008-08-26 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-26 06:11 --- Some initial patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-08/msg00238.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2007-06-02 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-02 07:37 --- (In reply to comment #2) http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/ieee754/?cvsroot=glibc Look into ldbl-128 directory... I don't think that's built into glibc on x86_64, is it? And, as far as I

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2007-05-31 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 11:56 --- To have decent support for __float128 in gfortran, we need to provide a __float128 math library. Do you happen to know any? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2007-05-31 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-31 21:44 --- (In reply to comment #1) To have decent support for __float128 in gfortran, we need to provide a __float128 math library. Do you happen to know any?

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2007-05-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 00:53 --- FX, this library might do the trick. I have x86-64 machine here to help on this. What about rolling our own with mpfr? Or is that too difficult. :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2007-05-31 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 02:52 --- (In reply to comment #3) What about rolling our own with mpfr? Or is that too difficult. :) It could be done with mpfr, but note that at the moment gfortran will provide either REAL(10) or REAL(16). This has

[Bug fortran/32049] Support on x86_64 also kind=16

2007-05-31 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 04:06 --- It seems then the first step is to support both real 10 and real 16 simultaneously if available. Then implement the soft library for real 16 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049