http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-16
21:23:28 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Nov 16 21:23:19 2010
New Revision: 166825
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166825
Log:
/
2010-11-13 Francois-Xavier Coudert
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
--- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-15
09:12:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Last patch:
Now: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00243.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2010-10-27
21:53:14 UTC ---
Last patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-10/msg00262.html
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 21:24
---
Subject: Bug 32049
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Aug 27 21:24:13 2010
New Revision: 163597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163597
Log:
PR fortran/32049
* gfortran.h (gfc_real
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-26 06:11 ---
Some initial patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-08/msg00238.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-02 07:37
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/ieee754/?cvsroot=glibc
>
> Look into ldbl-128 directory...
I don't think that's built into glibc on x86_64, is it? And, as far as
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 04:06
---
It seems then the first step is to support both real 10 and real 16
simultaneously if available. Then implement the soft library for real 16
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 02:52 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> What about rolling our own with mpfr? Or is that too difficult. :)
>
It could be done with mpfr, but note that at the moment gfortran
will provide either REAL(10) or REAL(16). This ha
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-01 00:53
---
FX, this library might do the trick. I have x86-64 machine here to help on
this.
What about rolling our own with mpfr? Or is that too difficult. :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-05-31 21:44 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> To have decent support for __float128 in gfortran, we need to provide a
> __float128 math library. Do you happen to know any?
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/ieee754/?cvsro
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 11:56
---
To have decent support for __float128 in gfortran, we need to provide a
__float128 math library. Do you happen to know any?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32049
13 matches
Mail list logo