[Bug fortran/32365] Better error message for specification statement in executable section

2009-12-11 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-11 21:44 --- (In reply to comment #2) > I wonder why this is not caught in parse.c's verify_st_order; the error > message there is much nicer Because it seems that verify_st_order is not called for every accepted statement. In

[Bug fortran/32365] Better error message for specification statement in executable section

2007-06-20 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 16:39 --- > There is nothing special about ST_OMP_THREADPRIVATE here, the Fortran parser > as whole behaves this way. Sorry for missing that. > what perhaps could be done is e.g. adding something like > case_decl: > gfc_erro

[Bug fortran/32365] Better error message for specification statement in executable section

2007-07-03 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW