--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 10:01 ---
Subject: Bug 32879
Author: dfranke
Date: Sun Jul 29 10:01:27 2007
New Revision: 127037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127037
Log:
2007-07-29 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 10:49 ---
Subject: Bug 32879
Author: dfranke
Date: Sun Jul 29 10:49:11 2007
New Revision: 127042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=127042
Log:
2007-07-29 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Backport
--- Comment #6 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-29 10:50 ---
Documented in 4.2 and trunk. Closing.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-07-28 09:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR32879
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg02029.html
--
--- Comment #1 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 16:30 ---
Confirmed, thought the documentation for RANDOM_NUMBER already mentions that it
uses KISS, so this applies only to the legacy intrinsics.
--
jb at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-24 16:44 ---
Confirmed, thought the documentation for RANDOM_NUMBER already mentions that
it
uses KISS, so this applies only to the legacy intrinsics.
Is KISS clear enough? If yes then it indeed only applies to RAND().
