--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-28 01:02
---
Subject: Bug 32928
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 28 01:02:36 2007
New Revision: 130484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130484
Log:
2007-11-27 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-28 01:12
---
Subject: Bug 32928
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Nov 28 01:12:31 2007
New Revision: 130487
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130487
Log:
2007-11-27 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-28 01:15
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 23:27
---
Created an attachment (id=14298)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14298action=view)
Rough draft patch
Here is a first cut at a patch. It does not successfully get the assignment to
the integer
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 23:32
---
Note on comment #6 : I used the following simpler test case using INTEGER
rather than the original test case which uses CHARACTER. The CHARACTER case
does not compile at all.
program chkdata
integer,
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 04:51
---
I think the problem here is that in match_data_constant we never even attempt
to match the array specification. Using gfc_match_array_spec or
gfc_match_array_ref I can successfully match and get the information.
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-29 19:19 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I am going to try this one.
Jerry,
This fixes it but I do not understand why it is necessary; nor have I
regtested. It's yours - I am going to tackle spanned pointers next, in the
hope of
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-26 01:55
---
I am going to try this one.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 13:29 ---
The problem seems to be that in decl.c the var_element() function assumes that
it only has to match a variable and not also, e.g., an array element.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32928
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-28 14:00 ---
R532 data-stmt-constant is scalar-constant
or scalar-constant-subobject
or signed-int-literal-constant
or signed-real-literal-constant
11 matches
Mail list logo
