--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-03 10:44
---
The Fortran part has its PR, I saw a PR for some C problem also, so I'm closing
this. If other you experience other powerpc regressions, please open new PRs.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
On 31 Aug 2007 04:33:12 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is taking undue
credit. PR30758 (marked as a duplicate) is the first addressing the
re-appearance of mayalias. there are another 5 PR, all appearing
--- Comment #12 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 07:59
---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
On 31 Aug 2007 04:33:12 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is
--- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 11:10
---
Allow me to step in... michelin60, what about discussing constructively? Here
are the comments I can make one the failures and your remarks. Please answer to
them, or ask further questions if something isn't
--- Comment #14 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 14:52 ---
FAIL: gfortran.dg/nint_2.f90 -O0 execution test
This one is annoying, I think I had it fixed (I saw it on numerous targets, and
fixed it on most... I believed it was fixed on all targets). If you are willing
--- Comment #15 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 15:52 ---
Regarding the last quote I am led to believe that Mr. Pinski is taking undue
credit. PR30758 (marked as a duplicate) is the first addressing the
re-appearance of mayalias. there are another 5 PR, all appearing
--- Comment #1 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:23 ---
Did not work as attachment with the following message:
GCC Bugzilla has suffered an internal error. Please save this page and send it
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with details of what you were doing at the time this
message
--- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-30 18:24 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
Log in before submitting the attachment
On 30 Aug 2007 18:23:23 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Comment #1 from
/var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub Jelinek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR target/33168
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_elf_in_small_data_p): Return
true if any of the
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-30 18:35 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
/var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub Jelinek
--- Comment #4 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 00:47 ---
( Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
/var/tmp/43/gcc-4.3.0/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/libstdc++-abi/abi.exp.
ERROR: could not compile testsuite_abi.cc
This was fixed by:
2007-08-30 Jakub
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 01:15 ---
First off don't CC anyone unless there is a real reason to like you know they
caused the issue. Second most of the rest of the failures are PR 33225
anyways.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #6 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 01:43 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
First off don't CC anyone unless there is a real reason to like you know they
caused the issue. Second most of the rest of the failures are PR 33225
anyways.
First of all I CC'd Dr.
On 31 Aug 2007 01:43:51 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop to
backporting
definitely aggravating productive use of GCC.
This is the trunk we are talking about, I am seriously thinking you
need
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 01:51 ---
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
On 31 Aug 2007 01:43:51 -, michelin60 at gmail dot com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 02:39
---
As Andrew stated, most of these testsuite failures were due to a regression
caused by one of my patches. I do monitor bugzilla submissions during the day.
However, I do this work in the evenings as a volunteer.
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 02:43 ---
Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop
to backporting definitely aggravating productive use of GCC.
I'm disinterested in the rest of this PR, but I will comment on the above.
--- Comment #10 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-08-31 04:33 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Subject: Re: GCC-4.3.0 Bootstrap testsuite error increase
Second I mentioned Mark Mitchell because he, as relesae manager, put a stop
to backporting definitely aggravating productive
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-31 05:29 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Now to the more confusing issue of backporting. I managed to find the
following:
(Stuff from Mark removed)
You're quoting email out of context.
Mr Kargl explains what happened from
19 matches
Mail list logo
