--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 03:21
---
Subject: Bug 33296
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Mar 15 03:20:57 2008
New Revision: 133236
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=133236
Log:
2008-03-14 Jerry DeLisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-15 03:23
---
Closing, test case committed to avoid regression.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-12 08:04 ---
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4 regression] nearest(huge(1.0),1.0)
gives an error
Dominique, can you please confirm this is fixed for you?
Works for me too on 4.4 and 4.3.
--
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 14:23
---
I will put a test case in and close this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33296
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 04:23
---
I wlll look into this a bit. This caught my attention because it says
ice-on-valid and it is set as an enhancement. That makes no sense.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-12 04:43
---
This works for me as well. I think it has been fixed. Dominique, can you
please confirm this is fixed for you? on 4.4
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33296
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-06 18:23 ---
It seems things are now worse:
next.c:91: assertion failed: !mpfr_set_exp ((x), (exp + 1))
f951: internal compiler error: Aborted
Works for me with 4.4.0 and 4.3.0 20080131/rev131976 and 4.3.0 (of today) on
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-19 15:59
---
It seems things are now worse:
$ cat s.f90
real x
x = nearest(huge(1.0),1.0)
end
$ ./bin/gfortran s.f90
next.c:91: assertion failed: !mpfr_set_exp ((x), (exp + 1))
f951: internal compiler error: Aborted
Please
