[Bug fortran/34040] relation between kinds and C types (for math builtins) shouldn't be hardcoded

2009-04-10 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 20:44 --- Is this still valid? Is there a relation to PR21203? -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34040] relation between kinds and C types (for math builtins) shouldn't be hardcoded

2008-06-15 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org

[Bug fortran/34040] relation between kinds and C types (for math builtins) shouldn't be hardcoded

2008-03-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34040

[Bug fortran/34040] relation between kinds and C types (for math builtins) shouldn't be hardcoded

2007-11-18 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 10:27 --- is that copysignl? Since the size of long double is 8 for -m2e, copysignl would be. I think that fortran has no real use on such short double targets, though. I'm inclined to make fortran unsupported for SH

[Bug fortran/34040] relation between kinds and C types (for math builtins) shouldn't be hardcoded

2007-11-17 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-17 17:10 --- First, a question: what are the math functions that should be used for DFmode on sh with -m2e? For example, what function should we use for copysign(DFmode, DFmode): is that copysignl? After talking about it