--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-28 17:57 ---
Subject: Bug 34112
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jun 28 17:56:41 2009
New Revision: 149036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=149036
Log:
2009-06-28 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-28 19:51 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.5).
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 14:22 ---
Add c.l.f link, mentioned in comment 9
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/7bbe1ee44c505be8/
Regarding TARGET_MANGLE_DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME (comment 2):
Currently, the decorating
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-16 16:35 ---
Note information I got from Kai. (He was not 100% sure for some of the items
and I probably misunderstood also parts thus take with a grain of salt.)
With the stdcall attribute on Win32 the @n suffix is
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-04 07:49 ---
It would be useful if one could support also
!$GNU attributes align:16 :: variable name
or alike for calls to libraries which need alignment such as FFTW.
--
--- Comment #9 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-04 08:35
---
(In reply to comment #8)
It would be useful if one could support also
!$GNU attributes align:16 :: variable name
or alike for calls to libraries which need alignment such as FFTW.
Yep, I think I
--- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-04 22:20 ---
Intel documentation in PDF format:
http://softwarecommunity.intel.com/isn/downloads/softwareproducts/pdfs/347685.pdf
Directives (!DEC$) start at page 335
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34112
--- Comment #6 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-03 14:40 ---
Initial patch by Franc,ois-Xavier:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-03/msg7.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34112
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 10:17
---
(In reply to comment #0)
As the standard makes not provisions and !DEC$ (*DEC$, cDEC$) is widely used,
gfortran should accept the following:
function CallWndRetProc(nCode, wParam, lParam)
!DEC$
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 15:12 ---
I thought a bit about that recently, and I don't like the idea of having to
support parts of another vendor's extension. The first other idea I had was to
add that STDCALL specification as an extension to the BIND
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-18 21:49 ---
This would be useful.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2007-11-16
23:09 ---
The problem with decorate is that its meaning depends on the platform. It may
decorate the name of alias with a _ prefix and @n postfix or only with a
_ prefix. Maybe one should start with STDCALL
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 19:25 ---
For stdcall and @n decoration, see also PR 31073.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34112
13 matches
Mail list logo
