As reported by Dominique, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-11/msg00105.html
Christopher D. Rickett replied: > (3) gfortran.dg/bind_c_coms.f90 which fails because of the warnings: > ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _f03_com2 > ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _mycom > ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _mycom2 > ld: warning alignment lost in merging tentative definition _singl i submitted a patch that fixes the alignment differences for bind(c) commons on OSX back in August (i think), but noone ever reviewed it * * * See the thread starting at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00138.html and the patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00142.html -- Summary: bind(c) Bind(C): Alignment of commons wrong on OSX Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code, patch Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34135
