[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-14 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 10:27 --- Fixed in trunk (r130928). Closing. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-14 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 10:25 --- Subject: Bug 34324 Author: dfranke Date: Fri Dec 14 10:25:12 2007 New Revision: 130928 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=130928 Log: 2007-12-14 Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] PR

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-13 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 19:16 --- Confirmed. Regtesting patch. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-13 Thread steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 20:29 --- Why does this need fixing? If people edit .mod files manually, failure is what they deserve. Does the proposed patch even work with more complex modules (due to the checksum)? From module.c: fputs

[Bug fortran/34324] Module files on CRLF systems

2007-12-13 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 20:45 --- Why does this need fixing? Someone noticed. Hence, someone checked. As the patch is not exactly intrusive, I think it's worth the change. On windows it suffices to open and close a file in the wrong editor to