--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 08:13 ---
Subject: Bug 34482
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Dec 20 08:13:09 2007
New Revision: 131098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=131098
Log:
2007-12-20 Tobias Burnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #13 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 08:15 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.3.0) [does not affect 4.2.x or 4.1.x].
Thanks for the report.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-20 11:56
---
Note I also saw this on powerpc-linux-gnu but I have not checked after the
patch.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-21 03:00
---
It works fine on ppc64-linux-gnu
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34482
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-19
02:14 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_4.f90 -O tests for errors
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-12/msg00214.html
Tested second version posted and it fixes the fail on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu.
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-17 08:14 ---
Patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-12/msg00214.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34482
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|burnus at gcc dot gnu dot |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 19:01 ---
Hmm, looking at the test suite results, it works on
i686-pc-linux-gnu, i386-pc-linux-gnu,
ia64-suse-linux-gnu, x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
arm-unknown-elf, v850-unknown-elf, i686-pc-cygwin,
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-15
19:24 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_4.f90 -O tests for errors
Hmm, looking at the test suite results, it works on
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
My last build on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 was 130926 (i.e., before
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 20:52 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Which version of the MPFR library are you using?
4.3.0
That's the GCC version, the MPFR version should be something like 2.2.x or
2.3.0.
print *, real(z'')
On
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 21:03 ---
As jerry pointed out on IRC, the default integer size could be 8, which
explains the result. Try instead:
print *, real(z'', 4)
print *, transfer(4294967295_8, 0.0_4)
print '(z12)',
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-15
21:51 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_4.f90 -O tests for errors
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 21:03
---
As jerry pointed out on IRC, the default integer size
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-15
22:29 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_4.f90 -O tests for errors
That's the GCC version, the MPFR version should be something like 2.2.x or
2.3.0.
2.3.0.
Dave
--
--- Comment #7 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-12-15
22:29 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/nan_4.f90 -O tests for errors
With 4.2.3, the results for the above are:
4.2949673E+09 0.00 4F80 0.00 4EFF8000 2.1432893E+09
The first version gave:
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 22:34
---
On ppc64 I get on example of #4:
0.000
0.000
0
0.000
0
0.000
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34482
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-15 22:37
---
The dump for nan_4.f90 has:
test ()
{
static real(kind=4) r = 0.0;
static integer(kind=4) options.0[7] = {68, 127, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0};
_gfortran_set_options (7, (void *) options.0);
r = 0.0;
... snip ...
16 matches
Mail list logo
