--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-25 23:52 ---
Thanks for testing/reducing/reporting this.
If one looks at the bounds, one sees that for negative lower bounds the output
is wrong. NAG correctly has:
2 1 0 1 -2 -3 -4
3 4 5 0 7 8 9
while
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 22:20 ---
This one is relatively easy:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
===
*** gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (revision 133278)
--- gcc/fortran/trans-array.c (work
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-03-27 11:08 ---
Some comments about the patch in comment #2:
1) If I am not mistaken, the first change is within a commented block (look at
the last line in the diff.:
' } */')
2) With the patch I have a lot of regressions on
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-28 08:33 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1) If I am not mistaken, the first change is within a commented block (look at
> the last line in the diff.:
> ' } */')
Yes, indeed - the comment has been made consistent with the inte
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 08:11 ---
Subject: Bug 35698
Author: pault
Date: Sat Mar 29 08:11:02 2008
New Revision: 133710
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133710
Log:
2008-03-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 08:18 ---
Subject: Bug 35698
Author: pault
Date: Sat Mar 29 08:17:36 2008
New Revision: 133711
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133711
Log:
2008-03-29 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 08:19 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
