--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:16 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3.
Thanks for the report.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-17 07:11 ---
Subject: Bug 35759
Author: pault
Date: Sat May 17 07:10:13 2008
New Revision: 135461
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135461
Log:
2008-05-17 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Backport fr
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-16 21:12 ---
Subject: Bug 35759
Author: pault
Date: Fri May 16 21:12:04 2008
New Revision: 135443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135443
Log:
2008-05-16 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-30 12:40 ---
This one should be straightforward, if lengthy to correct:
gfc_trans_where_2 is completely correct, as can be verified by doubling up the
line making the assignment in the WHERE block. ie:
WHERE (LDA)
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 23:23 ---
Confirm.
The algorithm below does essentially:
while (1,0,1,0,1)
uda1l( 1 _ 3 _ 5) = 2 3 4 5 6
else
udal1 ( _ 3 _ 5 _) = 6 5 4 3 2
done
That is
1. uda1l(1) = 2
2. uda1l(3) = 5 <---\__
3. uda1l(3) = 4 <---/
4. u
