--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 15:36 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-21 15:35 ---
Subject: Bug 35846
Author: domob
Date: Sun Sep 21 15:33:37 2008
New Revision: 140529
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140529
Log:
2008-09-21 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #5 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-20 11:52 ---
After coming back to this bug, I believe the problem is that gfc_conv_expr
takes care of finding out string lengths' for things like TRIM(x) which don't
have a cl->length, but gfc_conv_expr_descriptor which is called e
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #4 from d at domob dot eu 2008-05-21 15:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=15664)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15664&action=view)
Testcase without nested array constructors
Actually, this does not depend on nested array constructors as this test-case
pro
--- Comment #3 from d at domob dot eu 2008-05-21 15:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=15663)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15663&action=view)
Testcase without nested array constructors
Actually, this does not depend on nested array constructors as this test-case
pro
--- Comment #2 from d at domob dot eu 2008-05-20 07:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=15655)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15655&action=view)
Hackish patch
It seems the problem lies in gfc_conv_string_length, that can be called with a
gfc_charlen whose length is NUL
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-13 20:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=15474)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15474&action=view)
Backtrace
Confirmed. Backtrace is attached.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
