--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-08 00:30
---
Fixed on trunk.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-08 00:09
---
Subject: Bug 36421
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jun 8 00:09:01 2008
New Revision: 136547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136547
Log:
2008-06-07 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-08 00:00
---
Subject: Bug 36421
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Jun 7 23:59:53 2008
New Revision: 136545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=136545
Log:
2008-06-07 Jerry DeLisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-05 05:42
---
Patch in comment #5 is not right either. There is a dependency on pr36420 which
requires m to be set to -1, not zero. Stay tuned.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-05 01:19
---
The patch in comment#1 fails, printing nothing for a value of zero. This patch
works OK:
Index: write.c
===
--- write.c (revision 136387)
+++ w
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-03 18:33
---
Thanks Tobias, that example threw me off course. Thats why I thought I had to
go read the standard again, because i had never seen an A0 before. :) I will
go ahead and fix this one while I am at it unless you a
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-03 05:28 ---
> The standard says to ignore the w.d in the G descriptor
No, it only says to ignore the ".d" part. Gw.d is equivalent to Iw (and not to
Iw.d).
> Also you example uses a0 which is also rejected.
a0 is invalid as Aw
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-03 02:16
---
Tobias, I think it needs to go farther down to just before here:
/* Select a width if none was specified. The idea here is to always
print something. */
The standard says to ignore the w.d in the G desc
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-02 14:43 ---
Jerry, is this patch inserted at the right place or is there a better place?
Where do you think one should modify in order to get g0 working (PR36420 /
F2008)?
Index: libgfortran/io/write.c
==
