--- Comment #8 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-05 06:41 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-05 06:41 ---
Subject: Bug 37638
Author: domob
Date: Sun Oct 5 06:39:37 2008
New Revision: 140880
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140880
Log:
2008-10-05 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-04 10:40 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Hmm. I see that in my previous comment #3 I said the wrong thing: the attached
> sample code should be correct, once the name in the PASS argument is fixed.
> The reasoning behind #3 is tha
--- Comment #5 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-10-04 10:29 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The problem is clearly that because of the error the type-bound procedure
> remains in a somewhat "dubious" state (its pass_arg_num is invalid) and this
> causes the ICE when resolving an ac
--- Comment #4 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-04 10:16 ---
The problem is clearly that because of the error the type-bound procedure
remains in a somewhat "dubious" state (its pass_arg_num is invalid) and this
causes the ICE when resolving an actual call to it afterwards. Thi
--- Comment #3 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-09-24 14:50 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for the report Salvatore, I'll take this one on. It seems the new
> F2003
> features are starting to getting used, from the bug-noise :D
>
Unfortunately these features are not goin
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-24 14:39 ---
Thanks for the report Salvatore, I'll take this one on. It seems the new F2003
features are starting to getting used, from the bug-noise :D
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from sfilippone at uniroma2 dot it 2008-09-24 13:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=16400)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16400&action=view)
test case
ICE-on-invalid
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37638
