--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-19 14:34 ---
Fixed as obvious on trunk and 4.3
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-19 12:58 ---
Subject: Bug 37723
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 19 12:56:41 2008
New Revision: 141222
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141222
Log:
2008-10-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-19 12:52 ---
Subject: Bug 37723
Author: pault
Date: Sun Oct 19 12:51:06 2008
New Revision: 141221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141221
Log:
2008-10-19 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-15 14:33 ---
The patch on comment #6 works as advertised without regression
(i686-apple-darwin9).
Thanks for the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37723
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-15 09:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=16504)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16504&action=view)
A fix for the PR
The attachment is neither boostrapped nor regtested but does fix the PR.
I am not able to do an
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-13 19:57 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Paul, I'd like to draw your attention to this one. If you have any cycles to
> spare right now...
Hi Thomas,
I suspect that it has a lot to do with PR37787, which I just fixed.
I´m on to
--- Comment #4 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-12 11:30 ---
Paul, I'd like to draw your attention to this one. If you have any cycles to
spare right now...
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-06 08:34 ---
Reduced test case:
program try_cg0071
type seq
integer ia(10)
end type
TYPE(SEQ) UDA1R
type(seq) uda(1)
do j1 = 1,10
uda1r%ia(j1) = j1
enddo
uda = u
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-05 17:28
---
Confirmed on 4.3 and 4.1.2 so not a regression.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-10-05 13:03 ---
Confirmed on (powerpc|i686)-apple-darwin9. Since gfortran produces a wrong
code, I think the "severity" should be increased to "major" or even "critical".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37723
10 matches
Mail list logo
