http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38111
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-09 20:49 ---
Enhancement only - and probably a dupe of PR33341?!
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2010-04-27 18:07 ---
still fails with current trunk.
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-11-19 13:18 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Do you know of any compilers that catch this? As you say, it is not so easy
to
fix.
I believe ifort gets this right (compiled with 'ifort -S -heap-arrays 64), but
this is just looking at
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-18 19:57 ---
Joost,
Do you know of any compilers that catch this? As you say, it is not so easy to
fix.
BTW you say that this another case where an unneeded temp is created. I can
see your PRs after this. Which ones come
