https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38115
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38115
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-11-18 20:11:32 |2011-10-27 20:11:32
--- Comment #6 f
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords||missed-
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 00:22 ---
PR33341 belongs here as well.
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-11-20 18:54 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> duplicate of pr36935?
similar enough to make this one depend on PR36935. I think the testcases here
(certainly comment #1), are more difficult.
--
jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk changed:
--- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-20 14:33 ---
duplicate of pr36935?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38115
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-18 20:11 ---
Another tough one, I think.
Thanks
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2008-11-14 09:07 ---
I guess this one is similar enough to put here as well:
SUBROUTINE S1(a,i,j,k,m)
INTEGER :: a(3,6)
write(6,*) ALL(a(1:3,m).EQ.(/i,j,k/))
END
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38115
