http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-25
15:44:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 23121
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23121
draft patch, working but too many warnings (cf. test suite failures)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-22
17:30:27 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jan 22 17:30:22 2011
New Revision: 169130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=169130
Log:
2011-01-22 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-14
09:00:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
(I asked on comp.lang.fortran)
Cf.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/4b65b1cd206ce9fe
Or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-13
19:52:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
An other failure:
use iso_c_binding
type t1
integer :: i(5)
end type t1
type t2
type(t1) ::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-09
15:21:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Can this be closed? Is there something left to do here?
The first test case of comment 0 seems to be still unfixed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-01-09 15:31:09 UTC ---
Thomas posted his patch at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00067.html
With this patch, the test in comment #6 still gives an ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #15 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-09
15:33:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
The test case from comment 6 gives an ICE (segfault) in
gfc_conv_procedure_call's check for
fsym-as-type !=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-09
15:37:50 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Jan 9 15:37:47 2011
New Revision: 168614
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=168614
Log:
2011-01-09 Thomas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #17 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de tkoenig at netcologne dot
de 2011-01-09 16:00:14 UTC ---
Am 09.01.2011 16:33, schrieb burnus at gcc dot gnu.org:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #15 from Tobias
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc
--- Comment #11 from brtnfld at hdfgroup dot org 2010-05-03 14:50 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Can this be closed? Is there something left to do here?
As of gfortran 4.4.4 (and 4.5.1) the program in comment #7 does not compile but
gives the same error:
Error: CHARACTER argument
--- Comment #10 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-02 15:09
---
Can this be closed? Is there something left to do here?
--
dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-04 13:01 ---
Subject: Bug 38536
Author: mikael
Date: Sun Jan 4 13:01:12 2009
New Revision: 143050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=143050
Log:
2009-01-04 Mikael Morin mikael.mo...@tele2.fr
PR
--- Comment #8 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-01-04 12:27 ---
Withe the patch in comment #5 the problems reported in comment #4 disappear,
the test in comment #6 gives a bus error at compile time:
pr38536_3.f90: In function 'MAIN__':
pr38536_3.f90:1: internal compiler error:
--- Comment #7 from brtnfld at hdfgroup dot org 2008-12-31 15:36 ---
Additional failure:
SUBROUTINE test(buf, buf2)
USE, INTRINSIC :: ISO_C_BINDING
IMPLICIT NONE
CHARACTER(LEN=*), INTENT(INOUT), TARGET :: buf
CHARACTER(LEN=*), INTENT(INOUT), DIMENSION(1:2), TARGET :: buf2
--- Comment #6 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-30 22:47 ---
An other failure:
use iso_c_binding
type t1
integer :: i(5)
end type t1
type t2
type(t1) :: t(5)
end type t2
character(len=2),target :: str(2)
type(t2), target :: tt
type(C_PTR)
--- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-12-27 11:40 ---
With the patch in comment#2, I see two regressions:
[ibook-dhum] f90/bug% gfc
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr32601.f03
/opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/pr32601.f03:10: internal compiler
--- Comment #4 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-12-27 13:00 ---
If I remove the assert gfortran.dg/repack_arrays_1.f90 passes, while
gfortran.dg/pr32601.f03 gives:
print *, c_loc(get_ptr()) ! { dg-error has PRIVATE components }
1
Error: Parameter 'get_ptr' to
--- Comment #5 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-27 23:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=16994)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16994action=view)
another attempt, regression-tested
Regression-tested, but with regressions :-(.
They are probably unrelated
--- Comment #1 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-26 22:54 ---
About the second error:
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33497#c3
in resolve.c:
2095 else if (parent_ref != NULL parent_ref-type != REF_COMPONENT)
2096 gfc_internal_error (Unexpected
--- Comment #2 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-26 23:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=16989)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16989action=view)
patch, not regression-tested
This patch fixes the ICE and accepts the following (valid, I think) program
25 matches
Mail list logo
