https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #14 from koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: koenigni
Date: Wed Mar 22 19:12:24 2017
New Revision: 246406
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246406=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-03-12 Nicolas Koenig
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #13 from koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: koenigni
Date: Wed Mar 22 19:08:36 2017
New Revision: 246405
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246405=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-03-22 Nicolas Koenig
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #12 from koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: koenigni
Date: Mon Mar 20 16:50:00 2017
New Revision: 246284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=246284=gcc=rev
Log:
2017-03-12 Nicolas Koenig
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40964|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 05:38:57PM +, koenigni at student dot ethz.ch
wrote:
>
> (In reply to kargl from comment #7)
> >
> > Do you have a copyright assignment on file with the FSF
> > for GCC? Your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #9 from Nicolas Koenig ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #7)
> (In reply to Nicolas Koenig from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 40962 [details]
> > Proposed patch for EQUIVALENCE / VOLATILE
> >
> > This patch should cover the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #40962|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #6 from Nicolas Koenig ---
Created attachment 40962
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40962=edit
Proposed patch for EQUIVALENCE / VOLATILE
This patch should cover the case of one EQUIVALENCE object being VOLATILE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
Nicolas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||koenigni at student dot ethz.ch
---
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-14 09:56 ---
Helps to confirm it:-)
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-08 16:11 ---
Confirmed
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39239
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-19 15:37 ---
I now asked at c.l.f but so far there was no direct pointer to the standard.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/695d799c2e81b1b3
I think (in line with the replies in c.l.f) that
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-19 22:29 ---
Glan found the relevant part (see link above for more):
In 5.5.2.1: Data objects associated with an entity in a common
block are considered to be in that common block.
* * *
BIND(C) in equivalence is
15 matches
Mail list logo