[Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ???

2009-06-12 Thread bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 --- i created a compilable example from the code snippet given: INTEGER PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) INTEGER NCSP0,IARRAY2,I NCSP0 = 1 IARRAY2 = 0 DO I = 2, 341 IARRAY2 = IARRAY2 + 1

[Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ???

2009-06-12 Thread plivings at arb dot ca dot gov
, p...@arb Subject: [Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ??? --- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 17:17 --- i created a compilable example from the code snippet given: INTEGER PBLJARRAYPT(341,341,1) INTEGER NCSP0,IARRAY2,I NCSP0 = 1

[Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ???

2009-06-12 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-12 18:08 --- Closing -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40149] variable length still 6 ???

2009-05-14 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-14 17:46 --- Fortran bug reports are never given a Severity of Blocker. That value is reserved for problems with C/C++. Please attach the smallest compilable example that exhibits the problem and provide the exact command line