--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 14:40 ---
See PR 40583 for a possible explanation.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 14:25 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> It is extremely unlikely that such a change would go unnoticed. The GCC test
> suite contains .f90, .f03 and .f08 and .F90 files. (Admittedly, no .f95/.F95
> file.) The testsuite is run on
--- Comment #2 from thomas dot orgis at awi dot de 2009-06-29 12:54 ---
Well, then, I have to assume that the Source Mage gcc install screws up.
As to "contact the vendor": I change that to "fix that install process", as I
am sort of part of said GNU/Linux vendor, the Source Mage distrib
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-29 12:41 ---
> The automatism works fine for .f90 files, so I suppose it is supposed to
> work for .f95, too?
>
> I guess a fix is simple (making that file suffix known). I am rather wondering
> why our install of (as far as possi
