[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-03 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 06:40 --- (In reply to comment #8) Please try with a newer version of gfortran. Literally, hundreds of bugs and changes have occurred since version 4.3.0 was released. I believe this bug is a duplicate of

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-03 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #10 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-03 10:01 --- I updated gfortran as suggested and now abavrml.F compiles OK. Bug seems resolved. Thanks for advice. gfortran -v now responds with: Using built-in specs. Target: i386-apple-darwin8.10.1 Configured with:

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-03 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-03 14:15 --- Closing. Bug is fixed in newer versions of gfortran. -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-02 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #7 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-02 22:58 --- Although this program compiled OK under g77 it failed under gfortran. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40612

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-02 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 23:17 --- (In reply to comment #7) Although this program compiled OK under g77 it failed under gfortran. Please attach a tarball with all the files need to reproduce the failure, or us to a URL where we can get the original

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-01 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #1 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-02 02:47 --- Created an attachment (id=18116) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18116action=view) File that failed -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40612

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-01 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #2 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-02 02:49 --- Created an attachment (id=18117) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18117action=view) Preprocessor output? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40612

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-01 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #5 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-02 03:07 --- Is it duplicate of or associated with GCC Bugzilla Bug 30284? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40612

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-01 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #4 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-02 02:58 --- Created an attachment (id=18119) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18119action=view) Include file needed by SUBROUTINE MKVRS1 to show bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40612

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-01 Thread rogermc at iinet dot net dot au
--- Comment #3 from rogermc at iinet dot net dot au 2009-07-02 02:56 --- Created an attachment (id=18118) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18118action=view) An include file needed by SUBROUTINE MKVRS1 to show bug --

[Bug fortran/40612] internal compiler error: in gfc_add_modify, at fortran/trans.c

2009-07-01 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-02 04:41 --- (In reply to comment #5) Is it duplicate of or associated with GCC Bugzilla Bug 30284? Does the code compile with 4.3.3, 4.4.0 and trunk? 4.3.0 is fairly old. Additionally, there are numerous #include lines in