[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

2011-03-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-07 10:11:36 UTC --- As shown by pr47850, the problem is not restricted to PRODUCT, but likely to the whole list in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962#c3.

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

2009-08-25 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 17:09 --- Without checking, I'd expect it's not only PRODUCT, but all of the intrinsics allowed in init-expr by F2003. Offhand I'd blame expr.c (check_transformational), in particular: 2151 functions = (gfc_option.allow_std

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

2009-08-25 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 17:37 --- It turns out, that the PRODUCT is already simplified to EXPR_CONST before is is checked in expr.c (check_init_expr). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

2009-09-01 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-01 11:49 --- > It turns out, that the PRODUCT is already simplified to EXPR_CONST > before is is checked in expr.c (check_init_expr). To be more specific, in resolve.c (resolve_unknown_f) the simplification is implied via intrin

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

2017-06-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|