--- Comment #20 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-28 20:39 ---
Subject: Bug 41212
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Sep 28 20:38:53 2009
New Revision: 152250
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=152250
Log:
2009-09-28 H.J. Lu
Backport from mainline:
2009-
--- Comment #19 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-16 16:13 ---
Fixed.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #18 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-16 16:12 ---
Subject: Bug 41212
Author: matz
Date: Wed Sep 16 16:12:18 2009
New Revision: 151761
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151761
Log:
PR fortran/41212
* tree.h (struct tree_decl_common
--- Comment #17 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-15 17:56 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Does this PR 41347?
no, it doesn't.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41212
--- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-15 17:21 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01001.html
>
I'm not in a position to test this patch at the moment.
Does this PR 41347?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
--- Comment #15 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-15 16:20 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01001.html
This also fixes PR41312 (that I will close as a duplicate).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41212
--- Comment #14 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-15 15:21 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-09/msg01001.html
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #13 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-14 12:20 ---
Nah, not the full patch. Maybe the part that gives separate alias sets to
scalar variables. But there's plenty of time for reverting, let's try to
cobble up some other fixes first.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-12 11:46
---
We should instead revert
2009-08-18 Michael Matz
* trans-expr.c (gfc_conv_substring): Don't evaluate casted decl early,
change order of length calculation to (end - start) + 1.
(gfc_get
--- Comment #11 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-12 08:29 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Indeed. For fixing fwprop this:
[...]
> or this:
[...]
> will both fix the issue at hand. The first will propagate to everywhere
> (with the problem mentioned in the comment, so that would ne
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-09-03 17:23 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation at -O2
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, matz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #9 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 17:13 ---
> Indeed. For fixing fwprop t
--- Comment #9 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 17:13 ---
Indeed. For fixing fwprop this:
--- tree-ssa-forwprop.c (Revision 151348)
+++ tree-ssa-forwprop.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ forward_propagate_addr_expr (tree name,
/* If the use is in a deeper loop nest
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-09-03 16:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] miscompilation at -O2
On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, matz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #7 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 16:39 ---
> Hmm, in a sense what forward
--- Comment #7 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-03 16:39 ---
Hmm, in a sense what forward prop is doing is at least fishy. It forwards
the casted ADDR_EXPR into some references of y_13, but not into all of them.
As y_13 is a restrict pointer this is always going to be a problem,
14 matches
Mail list logo
