--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:36
---
Subject: Bug 41278
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Dec 1 04:36:30 2009
New Revision: 154863
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154863
Log:
2009-11-30 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:40
---
Subject: Bug 41278
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Dec 1 04:40:14 2009
New Revision: 154864
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154864
Log:
2009-11-30 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 04:41
---
Fixed on Trunk and 4.4
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-27 08:34 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Just a note of appreciation to Chris for reporting this bug and providing a
simple and extremely useful test case. When I get a moment, I will add Chris
to the test case as recognition.
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 13:02
---
This is what I would call a very fundamental bug, at the soul of what fortran
is suppose to do. I am looking at it but think it would go better with a team
effort here. Anyone have any thoughts about it?
--
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 14:35
---
I think we need to gfc_walk_op_expr before we try to gfc_conv_array_transpose
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 17:50
---
Removing the assert appears to fix this. Testing now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 19:05
---
Subject: Bug 41278
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Nov 26 19:05:37 2009
New Revision: 154680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154680
Log:
2009-11-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 19:10
---
Subject: Bug 41278
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Nov 26 19:10:29 2009
New Revision: 154681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=154681
Log:
2009-11-26 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 21:46 ---
The following assert is wrong:
gcc_assert (src_info-dimen == 2);
(and has been removed in the comment patch of comment 7). I only want to link
to an email which gives the reason why.
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-26 22:11
---
Just a note of appreciation to Chris for reporting this bug and providing a
simple and extremely useful test case. When I get a moment, I will add Chris
to the test case as recognition.
Shall we backport this
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-08 16:21 ---
Not a regression.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 14:54
---
ICE confirmed with test case on 4.5
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41278
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-09-05 15:34 ---
853 gcc_assert (src_info-dimen == 2);
(gdb) list
848 dest_ss = se-ss;
849
850 src_info = src_ss-data.info;
851 dest_info = dest_ss-data.info;
852 gcc_assert (dest_info-dimen == 2);
853
15 matches
Mail list logo
