[Bug fortran/41369] Empty derived-type wrongly rejected as function return type

2009-12-10 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 21:04 --- Subject: Bug 41369 Author: dfranke Date: Thu Dec 10 21:03:40 2009 New Revision: 155141 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=155141 Log: 2009-12-10 Daniel Franke franke.dan...@gmail.com PR

[Bug fortran/41369] Empty derived-type wrongly rejected as function return type

2009-12-10 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 21:05 --- Fixed in trunk. Closing. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/41369] Empty derived-type wrongly rejected as function return type

2009-09-16 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-09-16 08:45 --- The test is also rejected by g95 and ifort, the latter gives: error #7128: A derived-type-def must have at least one component-def-stmt. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41369

[Bug fortran/41369] Empty derived-type wrongly rejected as function return type

2009-09-16 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-16 10:33 --- (In reply to comment #1) The test is also rejected by g95 and ifort, the latter gives: error #7128: A derived-type-def must have at least one component-def-stmt. I did not claim that I have a valid Fortran 95