[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

2016-11-16 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

2011-12-11 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-11 20:42:29 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sun Dec 11 20:42:23 2011 New Revision: 182210 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=182210 Log: 2011-12-11 Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

2011-12-11 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41539 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

2010-07-15 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-15 21:39 --- (From update of attachment 20021) Obsolete duplicate. -- dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

2010-03-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 14:59 --- Created an attachment (id=20020) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20020action=view) Fixes this bug This does all the right things, except that the array elements cannot yet be referenced - another

[Bug fortran/41539] [OOP] Calling function which takes CLASS: Rank comparison does not work

2010-03-04 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 15:00 --- Created an attachment (id=20021) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20021action=view) Fixes this bug This does all the right things, except that the array elements cannot yet be referenced - another