https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41714
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 09:08 ---
Subject: Bug 41714
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 26 09:08:03 2009
New Revision: 153547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=153547
Log:
2009-10-26 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 09:13 ---
Fixed with r153547. Closing.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-25 10:24 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
internal compiler error: in tree_annotate_all_with_location, at gimplify.c:892
This goes away with the following patchlet:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-10-25 13:55 ---
The patches in comment #1 and #5 seem to work as advertized (currently
regtesting).
After having looked at the f2003 standard draft, I understand that
allocate(a, source=t2(1,2))
is equivalent to
allocate(t2::a)
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-10-25 17:20 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Did I missed something in the standard or is this a bug?
Probably the former!-(If I move
a%j=2
inside the type is (t2) block, the code compiles without error).
--
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16 21:25 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
In addition to this there are two more test cases failing:
Sorry, these were fake (my local source tree was messed up). The only real
failure is class_allocate_1.f03, from which one can
--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-16 16:22 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Problem: The patch in comment #1 regresses on class_allocate_1.f03:
In addition to this there are two more test cases failing:
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 13:14 ---
Certainly mine. I should have thought of this case when fixing PR41581. The
cure is for sure:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
===
---
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-15 20:27 ---
Problem: The patch in comment #1 regresses on class_allocate_1.f03:
gfortran-4.5 class_allocate_1.f03 -O1
class_allocate_1.f03: In function MAIN__:
class_allocate_1.f03:57:0: internal compiler error: in
10 matches
Mail list logo
