[Bug fortran/41831] Bug with management of NaNs

2009-10-26 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 15:10 --- NaNs don't exist in Fortran's data types except for the Fortran 2003's IEEE types. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41831

[Bug fortran/41831] Bug with management of NaNs

2009-10-26 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-26 22:39 --- > My conclusion is that there is a problem when the > NAN is passed from the C to the fortran. That's not my conclusion. :) > double C2F(returnanan)(void) > { (snip) > > PROGRAM test > DATA ONE/1.0D0

[Bug fortran/41831] Bug with management of NaNs

2009-10-27 Thread michael dot baudin at scilab dot org
--- Comment #3 from michael dot baudin at scilab dot org 2009-10-27 13:32 --- You are right, this was a bug in the fortran source code. I cannot add implicit none in this slatec/gamma routine, but declaring the return type of the function fixes the bug. Thank your for looking at this b