http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 12:33:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> One way to reject the abstract case in comment 11, would be to just do the
> checking, but not add the procedure to the operator list:
T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-16 12:04:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Comment 12 is fixed with r189022, but comment 11 is still accepted without
> > error.
One way to reject t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:54:29 UTC ---
Comment 12 is fixed with r189022, but comment 11 is still accepted without
error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-27 17:38:11 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Wed Jun 27 17:38:00 2012
New Revision: 189022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=189022
Log:
2012-06-27 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-23 13:54:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Here is a reduced version of comment 2, which is invalid according to comment
> 10:
Here is a non-abstract version of the test case in comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-19 15:53:02 UTC ---
Here is a reduced version of comment 2, which is invalid according to comment
10:
module m_sort
implicit none
type, abstract :: sort_t
contains
generic :: assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |accepts-invalid
Summary|[OOP]
