--- Comment #33 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-29 19:11 ---
Subject: Bug 42353
Author: pault
Date: Thu Apr 29 19:10:48 2010
New Revision: 158910
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158910
Log:
2010-04-29 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #26 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 13:13 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
A provisional fix for this PR
Actually, what's the issue here? At rev. 158483 the fortran-dev testsuite runs
cleanly on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and the test cases in this PR
--- Comment #27 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 13:50 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
(In reply to comment #25)
A provisional fix for this PR
Actually, what's the issue here? At rev. 158483 the fortran-dev testsuite runs
cleanly on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and the
--- Comment #28 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-04-18 13:55 ---
I am still getting the message:
Me too with a clean fortran-dev r158481.
Note that the patch in comment #25 fixes it without regression for the test
suite and my own tests.
--
--- Comment #29 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 17:24 ---
Subject: Bug 42353
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 18 17:24:35 2010
New Revision: 158492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158492
Log:
2010-04-18 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #30 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 17:25 ---
Subject: Bug 42353
Author: pault
Date: Sun Apr 18 17:25:41 2010
New Revision: 158493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=158493
Log:
2010-04-18 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
--- Comment #31 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 17:29 ---
Fixed on fortran-dev.
Thanks for the report, Harald.
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42353
--- Comment #32 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-18 17:29 ---
Hmmm better mark it as fixed
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-16 05:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=20391)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20391action=view)
A provisional fix for this PR
This bootstraps and regtests. I understand why it works but I want to
understand
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-22 04:30
---
Un-assigning. My approach to resolve this by avoiding the error message based
on the vaiable name did not work. I also am getting short on time again.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42353
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|org
--- Comment #21 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-01-18 22:18 ---
(In reply to comment #19)
Regressions on fortran-dev branch fixed.
Due to the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-12/msg00232.html
Jerry,
is this patch supposed to be complete for fortran-dev?
I still get
--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 00:25
---
Obviously we do not have the original test case added to the testsuite so we
can catch these things. I added gfcbug96d.f90 to the testsuite, thinking it
was the same issue as gfcbug96.f90. Lets just reopen this
--- Comment #23 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-19 02:37
---
Janus, reassigning to myself. I think I see a problem in the error checking
logic and I have a tentative patch that has regression tested fine. I want to
think a bit about whether I an fixing this correctly.
--- Comment #20 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-01-10 13:33 ---
Regressions on fortran-dev branch fixed.
This caused pr42680 .
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42353
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-09 23:11
---
Regressions on fortran-dev branch fixed. Committed revision 155778.
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2010-01-09 23:21 ---
Regressions on fortran-dev branch fixed.
Due to the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-12/msg00232.html
See the entry
2010-01-09 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/42353
*
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-30 17:34 ---
Reopening. As reported in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-12/msg00215.html,
the patch in comment #15 introduced several regressions on the fortran-dev
branch.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
18 matches
Mail list logo
