http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42831
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42831
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2010-10-02
08:00:55 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Oct 2 08:00:50 2010
New Revision: 164900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164900
Log:
2010-10-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/42831
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 19:04 ---
Perhaps a testcase should be added (either with -Warray-temporaries or scanning
dumps) to make sure we don't regress here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42831
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-13 18:59 ---
This doesn't seem to happen any more.
Can we close this?
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-09 22:13 ---
Somewhat reduced testcase below.
Note that the temporary depends on the POINTER attribute of 'table'. If POINTER
and corresponding ALLOCATE are removed, there is no more temporary array. Also,
if CENTIMETER is chang
