[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-02-03 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from nightstrike at gmail dot com 2010-02-04 04:10 --- The logs are not updated daily, but I try to do them frequently. I thought there was date information within the logs themselves. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42950

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-02-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-04 12:31 --- Regarding (2): gcc/fortran/cpp.c contains the following, see PR 42954 /* FIXME: Pandora's Box Using the macros below results in multiple breakages: - mingw will fail to compile this file as dependent macro

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-02-28 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-28 17:42 --- Patch for using _POSIX - untested. Index: libgfortran/io/io.h === --- libgfortran/io/io.h (Revision 157097) +++ libgfortran/io/io.h (Arbeitskopie) @@ -2

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-04 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 17:56 --- Another patch - please try! Index: libgfortran.h === --- libgfortran.h (revision 157215) +++ libgfortran.h (working copy) @@ -121,2 +121,9 @

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-04 19:09 --- (In reply to comment #4) > +/* MinGW needs to use the gnu_printf formatter. */ > +#if __MINGW32__ > +# define PRINTF_FORMAT gnu_printf > +#else > +# define PRINTF_FORMAT printf > +#endif Note I would do: +/* MinG

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 10:04 --- (In reply to comment #5) This patch has a problem about the printf formatter definitions in libgfortran.h header. So I suggest to use the following patch instead. I am current on to bootstrap it completely and test t

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 10:34 --- (In reply to comment #6) As by this patch libgfortran.h defines _POSIX, some additional features (at least for mingw-w64) getting active about localtime_r and gmtime_r (which getting implemented by defines, if _POSIX

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-05 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-06 07:21 --- Created an attachment (id=20034) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20034&action=view) Patch about printf and POSIX float conversion 2010-03-06 Kai TIetz PR/42950 * libgfortran.h

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-07 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 02:53 --- Kai, Patch in Comment #8 is OK to commit. Thanks! (I also regression tested on x86-64-linux-gnu.) -- jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-08 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-08 08:03 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Kai, > > Patch in Comment #8 is OK to commit. Thanks! > > (I also regression tested on x86-64-linux-gnu.) > Ok, applied at revision 157271. Patch for enumerators ERROR, WARNING, SILENT

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-12 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-12 08:57 --- The follow-up patch about those collision in enumerator names is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-03/msg00427.html to gcc's patch-ML. The only issue remaining open for mingw/cygwin targets after this

[Bug fortran/42950] gfortran testsuite failures on mingw64

2010-03-17 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-17 09:30 --- Close as fixed as only PR 42954 remains to be done. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --