--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 10:18
---
Subject: Bug 43040
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Jun 9 10:17:56 2010
New Revision: 160459
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=160459
Log:
PR fortran/43040
* f95-lang.c
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-09 10:20
---
Checked that it is not an issue.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-08 20:39
---
I'm currently looking at math builtins for __float128 support, so I'll check
that.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 08:35 ---
Subject: Bug 43040
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Feb 16 08:35:05 2010
New Revision: 156796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=156796
Log:
2010-02-16 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
PR
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-16 13:51 ---
I think the comment applies only to FLOOR and ROUND - at least when it was
first written those were the only ones present. If I read the source code
correctly, the ME floor(l,f) is not directly called but instead the
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-12 13:54 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
/* We define these separately as the fortran versions have different
semantics (they return an integer type) */
gfc_define_builtin (__builtin_roundl, mfunc_longdouble[0],
ugh.
